1. Home
  2. Software
  3. Cobalt Strike

Cobalt Strike

Cobalt Strike is a commercial, full-featured, remote access tool that bills itself as "adversary simulation software designed to execute targeted attacks and emulate the post-exploitation actions of advanced threat actors". Cobalt Strike’s interactive post-exploit capabilities cover the full range of ATT&CK tactics, all executed within a single, integrated system.[1]

In addition to its own capabilities, Cobalt Strike leverages the capabilities of other well-known tools such as Metasploit and Mimikatz.[1]

ID: S0154
ⓘ
Type: MALWARE
ⓘ
Platforms: Windows, Linux, macOS
Contributors: Martin Sohn Christensen, Improsec; Josh Abraham
Version: 1.13
Created: 14 December 2017
Last Modified: 25 September 2024
Enterprise Layer
download view

Techniques Used

Domain ID Name Use
Enterprise T1197 BITS任务

Cobalt Strike can download a hosted "beacon" payload using BITSAdmin.[2][3][4]
Enterprise T1047 Windows管理规范

Cobalt Strike can use WMI to deliver a payload to a remote host.[1][4][5]
Enterprise T1005 从本地系统获取数据

Cobalt Strike can collect data from a local system.[6][4]
Enterprise T1090 .001 代理: Internal Proxy

Cobalt Strike can be configured to have commands relayed over a peer-to-peer network of infected hosts. This can be used to limit the number of egress points, or provide access to a host without direct internet access.[1][4]
.004 代理: Domain Fronting

Cobalt Strike has the ability to accept a value for HTTP Host Header to enable domain fronting.[4]
Enterprise T1550 .002 使用备用认证材料: Pass the Hash

Cobalt Strike can perform pass the hash.[6]
Enterprise T1112 修改注册表

Cobalt Strike can modify Registry values within HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\\Excel\Security\AccessVBOM\ to enable the execution of additional code.[3]
Enterprise T1543 .003 创建或修改系统进程: Windows Service

Cobalt Strike can install a new service.[6]
Enterprise T1137 .001 办公应用启动: Office Template Macros

Cobalt Strike has the ability to use an Excel Workbook to execute additional code by enabling Office to trust macros and execute code without user permission.[3]
Enterprise T1573 .001 加密通道: Symmetric Cryptography

Cobalt Strike has the ability to use AES-256 symmetric encryption in CBC mode with HMAC-SHA-256 to encrypt task commands and XOR to encrypt shell code and configuration data.[3]
.002 加密通道: Asymmetric Cryptography

Cobalt Strike can use RSA asymmetric encryption with PKCS1 padding to encrypt data sent to the C2 server.[3]
Enterprise T1572 协议隧道

Cobalt Strike uses a custom command and control protocol that is encapsulated in HTTP, HTTPS, or DNS. In addition, it conducts peer-to-peer communication over Windows named pipes encapsulated in the SMB protocol. All protocols use their standard assigned ports.[1][4]
Enterprise T1620 反射性代码加载

Cobalt Strike's execute-assembly command can run a .NET executable within the memory of a sacrificial process by loading the CLR.[4]
Enterprise T1140 反混淆/解码文件或信息

Cobalt Strike can deobfuscate shellcode using a rolling XOR and decrypt metadata from Beacon sessions.[3][4]
Enterprise T1059 .001 命令与脚本解释器: PowerShell

Cobalt Strike can execute a payload on a remote host with PowerShell. This technique does not write any data to disk.[1][7] Cobalt Strike can also use PowerSploit and other scripting frameworks to perform execution.[6][8][3][4]
.003 命令与脚本解释器: Windows Command Shell

Cobalt Strike uses a command-line interface to interact with systems.[6][3][4][9]
.005 命令与脚本解释器: Visual Basic

Cobalt Strike can use VBA to perform execution.[6][8][3]
.006 命令与脚本解释器: Python

Cobalt Strike can use Python to perform execution.[6][8][3][4]
.007 命令与脚本解释器: JavaScript

The Cobalt Strike System Profiler can use JavaScript to perform reconnaissance actions.[3]
Enterprise T1562 .001 妨碍防御: Disable or Modify Tools

Cobalt Strike has the ability to use Smart Applet attacks to disable the Java SecurityManager sandbox.[3][4]
Enterprise T1203 客户端执行漏洞利用

Cobalt Strike can exploit Oracle Java vulnerabilities for execution, including CVE-2011-3544, CVE-2013-2465, CVE-2012-4681, and CVE-2013-2460.[3][4]
Enterprise T1113 屏幕捕获

Cobalt Strike's Beacon payload is capable of capturing screenshots.[1][10][4]
Enterprise T1071 .001 应用层协议: Web Protocols

Cobalt Strike can use a custom command and control protocol that can be encapsulated in HTTP or HTTPS. All protocols use their standard assigned ports.[1][3][4][11][12]
.002 应用层协议: File Transfer Protocols

Cobalt Strike can conduct peer-to-peer communication over Windows named pipes encapsulated in the SMB protocol. All protocols use their standard assigned ports.[1][3]
.004 应用层协议: DNS

Cobalt Strike can use a custom command and control protocol that can be encapsulated in DNS. All protocols use their standard assigned ports.[1][3][4]

Enterprise T1003 .001 操作系统凭证转储: LSASS Memory

Cobalt Strike can spawn a job to inject into LSASS memory and dump password hashes.[4]
.002 操作系统凭证转储: Security Account Manager

Cobalt Strike can recover hashed passwords.[1]
Enterprise T1030 数据传输大小限制

Cobalt Strike will break large data sets into smaller chunks for exfiltration.[1]
Enterprise T1001 .003 数据混淆: Protocol or Service Impersonation

Cobalt Strike can leverage the HTTP protocol for C2 communication, while hiding the actual data in either an HTTP header, URI parameter, the transaction body, or appending it to the URI.[4]
Enterprise T1132 .001 数据编码: Standard Encoding

Cobalt Strike can use Base64, URL-safe Base64, or NetBIOS encoding in its C2 traffic.[4]
Enterprise T1083 文件和目录发现

Cobalt Strike can explore files on a compromised system.[4]
Enterprise T1078 .002 有效账户: Domain Accounts

Cobalt Strike can use known credentials to run commands and spawn processes as a domain user account.[1][8][4]
.003 有效账户: Local Accounts

Cobalt Strike can use known credentials to run commands and spawn processes as a local user account.[1][8]
Enterprise T1106 本机API

Cobalt Strike's Beacon payload is capable of running shell commands without cmd.exe and PowerShell commands without powershell.exe[1][3][4]
Enterprise T1068 权限提升漏洞利用

Cobalt Strike can exploit vulnerabilities such as MS14-058.[6][4]
Enterprise T1069 .001 权限组发现: Local Groups

Cobalt Strike can use net localgroup to list local groups on a system.[4]
.002 权限组发现: Domain Groups

Cobalt Strike can identify targets by querying account groups on a domain contoller.[4]
Enterprise T1012 查询注册表

Cobalt Strike can query HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\\Excel\Security\AccessVBOM\ to determine if the security setting for restricting default programmatic access is enabled.[3][4]
Enterprise T1185 浏览器会话劫持

Cobalt Strike can perform browser pivoting and inject into a user's browser to inherit cookies, authenticated HTTP sessions, and client SSL certificates.[1][4]
Enterprise T1027 混淆文件或信息

Cobalt Strike can hash functions to obfuscate calls to the Windows API and use a public/private key pair to encrypt Beacon session metadata.[3][4]
.005 Indicator Removal from Tools

Cobalt Strike includes a capability to modify the Beacon payload to eliminate known signatures or unpacking methods.[1][4]
Enterprise T1548 .002 滥用权限提升控制机制: Bypass User Account Control

Cobalt Strike can use a number of known techniques to bypass Windows UAC.[1][4]
.003 滥用权限提升控制机制: Sudo and Sudo Caching

Cobalt Strike can use sudo to run a command.[4]
Enterprise T1070 .006 移除指标: Timestomp

Cobalt Strike can timestomp any files or payloads placed on a target machine to help them blend in.[1][4]
Enterprise T1218 .011 系统二进制代理执行: Rundll32

Cobalt Strike can use rundll32.exe to load DLL from the command line.[4][5][9]
Enterprise T1569 .002 系统服务: Service Execution

Cobalt Strike can use PsExec to execute a payload on a remote host. It can also use Service Control Manager to start new services.[1][6][4]
Enterprise T1007 系统服务发现

Cobalt Strike can enumerate services on compromised hosts.[4]
Enterprise T1049 系统网络连接发现

Cobalt Strike can produce a sessions report from compromised hosts.[3]
Enterprise T1016 系统网络配置发现

Cobalt Strike can determine the NetBios name and the IP addresses of targets machines including domain controllers.[7][4]
Enterprise T1135 网络共享发现

Cobalt Strike can query shared drives on the local system.[6]
Enterprise T1046 网络服务发现

Cobalt Strike can perform port scans from an infected host.[1][3][4]
Enterprise T1134 .001 访问令牌操控: Token Impersonation/Theft

Cobalt Strike can steal access tokens from exiting processes.[1][4]
.003 访问令牌操控: Make and Impersonate Token

Cobalt Strike can make tokens from known credentials.[1]
.004 访问令牌操控: Parent PID Spoofing

Cobalt Strike can spawn processes with alternate PPIDs.[8][4]
Enterprise T1087 .002 账号发现: Domain Account

Cobalt Strike can determine if the user on an infected machine is in the admin or domain admin group.[7]
Enterprise T1518 软件发现

The Cobalt Strike System Profiler can discover applications through the browser and identify the version of Java the target has.[4]
Enterprise T1105 输入工具传输

Cobalt Strike can deliver additional payloads to victim machines.[3][4]
Enterprise T1056 .001 输入捕获: Keylogging

Cobalt Strike can track key presses with a keylogger module.[1][10][4]
Enterprise T1057 进程发现

Cobalt Strike's Beacon payload can collect information on process details.[1][3][4]
Enterprise T1055 进程注入

Cobalt Strike can inject a variety of payloads into processes dynamically chosen by the adversary.[1][4][5]
.001 Dynamic-link Library Injection

Cobalt Strike has the ability to load DLLs via reflective injection.[3][4]
.012 Process Hollowing

Cobalt Strike can use process hollowing for execution.[6][4]
Enterprise T1021 .001 远程服务: Remote Desktop Protocol

Cobalt Strike can start a VNC-based remote desktop server and tunnel the connection through the already established C2 channel.[1][13]
.002 远程服务: SMB/Windows Admin Shares

Cobalt Strike can use Window admin shares (C$ and ADMIN$) for lateral movement.[6][9]
.003 远程服务: Distributed Component Object Model

Cobalt Strike can deliver Beacon payloads for lateral movement by leveraging remote COM execution.[14]
.004 远程服务: SSH

Cobalt Strike can SSH to a remote service.[6][4]
.006 远程服务: Windows Remote Management

Cobalt Strike can use WinRM to execute a payload on a remote host.[1][4]
Enterprise T1018 远程系统发现

Cobalt Strike uses the native Windows Network Enumeration APIs to interrogate and discover targets in a Windows Active Directory network.[1][3][4]
Enterprise T1564 .010 隐藏伪装: Process Argument Spoofing

Cobalt Strike can use spoof arguments in spawned processes that execute beacon commands.[4]
Enterprise T1095 非应用层协议

Cobalt Strike can be configured to use TCP, ICMP, and UDP for C2 communications.[3][4]
Enterprise T1029 预定传输

Cobalt Strike can set its Beacon payload to reach out to the C2 server on an arbitrary and random interval.[1]
Enterprise T1553 .002 颠覆信任控制: Code Signing

Cobalt Strike can use self signed Java applets to execute signed applet attacks.[3][4]

Groups That Use This Software

ID Name References
G0129 Mustang Panda

[15][16][17][18][19]
G0027 Threat Group-3390

[20]
G0050 APT32

[21][22][23][24][25][10][26]
G1022 ToddyCat

[12]
G0073 APT19

[27]
G0037 FIN6

[28]
G0092 TA505

[29]
G0052 CopyKittens

[30]
G0079 DarkHydrus

[31][32]
G1040 Play

[33]
G1006 Earth Lusca

[34]
G0046 FIN7

[35][36][37]
G1020 Mustard Tempest

[38]
G0096 APT41

[39][40][41][42]
G0045 menuPass

[11]
G0143 Aquatic Panda

[43]
G0080 Cobalt Group

[44][45][46][47] [48][49][50][51]
G0034 Sandworm Team

Sandworm Team has used multiple publicly available tools during operations, such as Cobalt Strike.[52]
G0065 Leviathan

[53][54][55]
G0016 APT29

[56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]
G1021 Cinnamon Tempest

[38][67]
G0067 APT37

[68]
G1014 LuminousMoth

[69][70]
G0114 Chimera

[71][72]
G0119 Indrik Spider

[73][38][74]
G0102 Wizard Spider

[75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82]

Campaigns

ID Name Description
C0040 APT41 DUST

Cobalt Strike was used during APT41 DUST.[41]
C0015 C0015

[5]
C0017 C0017

During C0017, APT41 used the DUSTPAN in-memory dropper to drop a Cobalt Strike BEACON backdoor onto a compromised network.[42]
C0018 C0018

[83]
C0021 C0021

[84][85]
C0024 SolarWinds Compromise

[56][57]

References

  1. Strategic Cyber LLC. (2017, March 14). Cobalt Strike Manual. Retrieved May 24, 2017.
  2. Strategic Cyber, LLC. (n.d.). Scripted Web Delivery. Retrieved January 23, 2018.
  3. Mavis, N. (2020, September 21). The Art and Science of Detecting Cobalt Strike. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
  4. Strategic Cyber LLC. (2020, November 5). Cobalt Strike: Advanced Threat Tactics for Penetration Testers. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  5. DFIR Report. (2021, November 29). CONTInuing the Bazar Ransomware Story. Retrieved September 29, 2022.
  6. Cobalt Strike. (2017, December 8). Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
  7. Dahan, A. et al. (2019, December 11). DROPPING ANCHOR: FROM A TRICKBOT INFECTION TO THE DISCOVERY OF THE ANCHOR MALWARE. Retrieved September 10, 2020.
  8. Mudge, R. (2017, May 23). Cobalt Strike 3.8 – Who’s Your Daddy?. Retrieved June 4, 2019.
  9. Kenefick, I. et al. (2022, October 12). Black Basta Ransomware Gang Infiltrates Networks via QAKBOT, Brute Ratel, and Cobalt Strike. Retrieved February 6, 2023.
  10. Amnesty International. (2021, February 24). Vietnamese activists targeted by notorious hacking group. Retrieved March 1, 2021.
  11. GREAT. (2021, March 30). APT10: sophisticated multi-layered loader Ecipekac discovered in A41APT campaign. Retrieved June 17, 2021.
  12. Dedola, G. et al. (2023, October 12). ToddyCat: Keep calm and check logs. Retrieved January 3, 2024.
  13. Cybereason. (2022, August 17). Bumblebee Loader – The High Road to Enterprise Domain Control. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
  14. Mudge, R. (2017, January 24). Scripting Matt Nelson’s MMC20.Application Lateral Movement Technique. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
  15. Meyers, A. (2018, June 15). Meet CrowdStrike’s Adversary of the Month for June: MUSTANG PANDA. Retrieved April 12, 2021.
  16. Anomali Threat Research. (2019, October 7). China-Based APT Mustang Panda Targets Minority Groups, Public and Private Sector Organizations. Retrieved April 12, 2021.
  17. Counter Threat Unit Research Team. (2019, December 29). BRONZE PRESIDENT Targets NGOs. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  18. Insikt Group. (2020, July 28). CHINESE STATE-SPONSORED GROUP ‘REDDELTA’ TARGETS THE VATICAN AND CATHOLIC ORGANIZATIONS. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  19. Roccia, T., Seret, T., Fokker, J. (2021, March 16). Technical Analysis of Operation Dianxun. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  20. Lunghi, D. et al. (2020, February). Uncovering DRBControl. Retrieved November 12, 2021.
  21. Carr, N.. (2017, May 14). Cyber Espionage is Alive and Well: APT32 and the Threat to Global Corporations. Retrieved June 18, 2017.
  22. Lassalle, D., et al. (2017, November 6). OceanLotus Blossoms: Mass Digital Surveillance and Attacks Targeting ASEAN, Asian Nations, the Media, Human Rights Groups, and Civil Society. Retrieved November 6, 2017.
  23. Dahan, A. (2017, May 24). OPERATION COBALT KITTY: A LARGE-SCALE APT IN ASIA CARRIED OUT BY THE OCEANLOTUS GROUP. Retrieved November 5, 2018.
  24. Dahan, A. (2017). Operation Cobalt Kitty. Retrieved December 27, 2018.
  25. Adair, S. and Lancaster, T. (2020, November 6). OceanLotus: Extending Cyber Espionage Operations Through Fake Websites. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
  26. Ray, V. and Hayashi, K. (2019, February 1). Tracking OceanLotus’ new Downloader, KerrDown. Retrieved October 1, 2021.
  27. Ahl, I. (2017, June 06). Privileges and Credentials: Phished at the Request of Counsel. Retrieved May 17, 2018.
  28. McKeague, B. et al. (2019, April 5). Pick-Six: Intercepting a FIN6 Intrusion, an Actor Recently Tied to Ryuk and LockerGoga Ransomware. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
  29. Terefos, A. (2020, November 18). TA505: A Brief History of Their Time. Retrieved July 14, 2022.
  30. ClearSky Cyber Security and Trend Micro. (2017, July). Operation Wilted Tulip: Exposing a cyber espionage apparatus. Retrieved August 21, 2017.
  31. Falcone, R., et al. (2018, July 27). New Threat Actor Group DarkHydrus Targets Middle East Government. Retrieved August 2, 2018.
  32. Unit 42. (2017, December 15). Unit 42 Playbook Viewer. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
  33. Trend Micro Research. (2023, July 21). Ransomware Spotlight: Play. Retrieved September 24, 2024.
  34. Chen, J., et al. (2022). Delving Deep: An Analysis of Earth Lusca’s Operations. Retrieved July 1, 2022.
  35. Loui, E. and Reynolds, J. (2021, August 30). CARBON SPIDER Embraces Big Game Hunting, Part 1. Retrieved September 20, 2021.
  36. The Record. (2022, January 7). FBI: FIN7 hackers target US companies with BadUSB devices to install ransomware. Retrieved January 14, 2022.
  37. Abdo, B., et al. (2022, April 4). FIN7 Power Hour: Adversary Archaeology and the Evolution of FIN7. Retrieved April 5, 2022.
  38. Microsoft. (2022, May 9). Ransomware as a service: Understanding the cybercrime gig economy and how to protect yourself. Retrieved March 10, 2023.
  39. Glyer, C, et al. (2020, March). This Is Not a Test: APT41 Initiates Global Intrusion Campaign Using Multiple Exploits. Retrieved April 28, 2020.
  40. Rostovcev, N. (2021, June 10). Big airline heist APT41 likely behind a third-party attack on Air India. Retrieved August 26, 2021.
  41. Mike Stokkel et al. (2024, July 18). APT41 Has Arisen From the DUST. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
  42. Rufus Brown, Van Ta, Douglas Bienstock, Geoff Ackerman, John Wolfram. (2022, March 8). Does This Look Infected? A Summary of APT41 Targeting U.S. State Governments. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
  43. Wiley, B. et al. (2021, December 29). OverWatch Exposes AQUATIC PANDA in Possession of Log4Shell Exploit Tools During Hands-on Intrusion Attempt. Retrieved January 18, 2022.
  1. Svajcer, V. (2018, July 31). Multiple Cobalt Personality Disorder. Retrieved September 5, 2018.
  2. Positive Technologies. (2017, August 16). Cobalt Strikes Back: An Evolving Multinational Threat to Finance. Retrieved September 5, 2018.
  3. Matveeva, V. (2017, August 15). Secrets of Cobalt. Retrieved October 10, 2018.
  4. Mesa, M, et al. (2017, June 1). Microsoft Word Intruder Integrates CVE-2017-0199, Utilized by Cobalt Group to Target Financial Institutions. Retrieved October 10, 2018.
  5. Klijnsma, Y.. (2017, November 28). Gaffe Reveals Full List of Targets in Spear Phishing Attack Using Cobalt Strike Against Financial Institutions. Retrieved October 10, 2018.
  6. Klijnsma, Y.. (2018, January 16). First Activities of Cobalt Group in 2018: Spear Phishing Russian Banks. Retrieved October 10, 2018.
  7. CrowdStrike. (2018, February 26). CrowdStrike 2018 Global Threat Report. Retrieved October 10, 2018.
  8. Giagone, R., Bermejo, L., and Yarochkin, F. (2017, November 20). Cobalt Strikes Again: Spam Runs Use Macros and CVE-2017-8759 Exploit Against Russian Banks. Retrieved March 7, 2019.
  9. Roncone, G. et al. (n.d.). APT44: Unearthing Sandworm. Retrieved July 11, 2024.
  10. Axel F, Pierre T. (2017, October 16). Leviathan: Espionage actor spearphishes maritime and defense targets. Retrieved February 15, 2018.
  11. FireEye. (2018, March 16). Suspected Chinese Cyber Espionage Group (TEMP.Periscope) Targeting U.S. Engineering and Maritime Industries. Retrieved April 11, 2018.
  12. CISA. (2021, July 19). (AA21-200A) Joint Cybersecurity Advisory – Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures of Indicted APT40 Actors Associated with China’s MSS Hainan State Security Department. Retrieved August 12, 2021.
  13. FireEye. (2020, December 13). Highly Evasive Attacker Leverages SolarWinds Supply Chain to Compromise Multiple Global Victims With SUNBURST Backdoor. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  14. NCSC, CISA, FBI, NSA. (2021, May 7). Further TTPs associated with SVR cyber actors. Retrieved July 29, 2021.
  15. Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC). (2021, May 27). New sophisticated email-based attack from NOBELIUM. Retrieved May 28, 2021.
  16. MSTIC. (2021, May 28). Breaking down NOBELIUM’s latest early-stage toolset. Retrieved August 4, 2021.
  17. Guerrero-Saade, J. (2021, June 1). NobleBaron | New Poisoned Installers Could Be Used In Supply Chain Attacks. Retrieved August 4, 2021.
  18. ESET. (2022, February). THREAT REPORT T3 2021. Retrieved February 10, 2022.
  19. Secureworks CTU. (n.d.). IRON RITUAL. Retrieved February 24, 2022.
  20. Secureworks CTU. (2021, May 28). USAID-Themed Phishing Campaign Leverages U.S. Elections Lure. Retrieved February 24, 2022.
  21. NSA, FBI, DHS. (2021, April 15). Russian SVR Targets U.S. and Allied Networks. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  22. UK NCSC. (2021, April 15). UK and US call out Russia for SolarWinds compromise. Retrieved April 16, 2021.
  23. Mandiant. (2020, April 27). Assembling the Russian Nesting Doll: UNC2452 Merged into APT29. Retrieved March 26, 2023.
  24. SecureWorks. (n.d.). BRONZE STARLIGHT. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
  25. Cash, D., Grunzweig, J., Meltzer, M., Adair, S., Lancaster, T. (2021, August 17). North Korean APT InkySquid Infects Victims Using Browser Exploits. Retrieved September 30, 2021.
  26. Lechtik, M, and etl. (2021, July 14). LuminousMoth APT: Sweeping attacks for the chosen few. Retrieved October 20, 2022.
  27. Botezatu, B and etl. (2021, July 21). LuminousMoth - PlugX, File Exfiltration and Persistence Revisited. Retrieved October 20, 2022.
  28. Cycraft. (2020, April 15). APT Group Chimera - APT Operation Skeleton key Targets Taiwan Semiconductor Vendors. Retrieved August 24, 2020..
  29. Jansen, W . (2021, January 12). Abusing cloud services to fly under the radar. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
  30. Podlosky, A., Feeley, B. (2021, March 17). INDRIK SPIDER Supersedes WastedLocker with Hades Ransomware to Circumvent OFAC Sanctions. Retrieved September 15, 2021.
  31. Mandiant Intelligence. (2022, June 2). To HADES and Back: UNC2165 Shifts to LOCKBIT to Evade Sanctions. Retrieved July 29, 2024.
  32. Kimberly Goody, Jeremy Kennelly, Joshua Shilko, Steve Elovitz, Douglas Bienstock. (2020, October 28). Unhappy Hour Special: KEGTAP and SINGLEMALT With a Ransomware Chaser. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
  33. DHS/CISA. (2020, October 28). Ransomware Activity Targeting the Healthcare and Public Health Sector. Retrieved October 28, 2020.
  34. The DFIR Report. (2020, October 8). Ryuk’s Return. Retrieved October 9, 2020.
  35. The DFIR Report. (2020, November 5). Ryuk Speed Run, 2 Hours to Ransom. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
  36. The DFIR Report. (2020, October 18). Ryuk in 5 Hours. Retrieved October 19, 2020.
  37. Sean Gallagher, Peter Mackenzie, Elida Leite, Syed Shahram, Bill Kearney, Anand Aijan, Sivagnanam Gn, Suraj Mundalik. (2020, October 14). They’re back: inside a new Ryuk ransomware attack. Retrieved October 14, 2020.
  38. Podlosky, A., Hanel, A. et al. (2020, October 16). WIZARD SPIDER Update: Resilient, Reactive and Resolute. Retrieved June 15, 2021.
  39. Shilko, J., et al. (2021, October 7). FIN12: The Prolific Ransomware Intrusion Threat Actor That Has Aggressively Pursued Healthcare Targets. Retrieved June 15, 2023.
  40. Venere, G. Neal, C. (2022, June 21). Avos ransomware group expands with new attack arsenal. Retrieved January 11, 2023.
  41. Dunwoody, M., et al. (2018, November 19). Not So Cozy: An Uncomfortable Examination of a Suspected APT29 Phishing Campaign. Retrieved November 27, 2018.
  42. Microsoft Defender Research Team. (2018, December 3). Analysis of cyberattack on U.S. think tanks, non-profits, public sector by unidentified attackers. Retrieved April 15, 2019.